After the Boston Bombings, Should We Blame the Parents?

April 21, 2013  |  Uncategorized

The bullets have stopped flying, the bombs are defused and one epic manhunt is over in Watertown. And as satisfying as it is to have some small amount of closure on the horrors of the last week, a chasm remains between the end of the police work and the beginning of understanding how something like this could happen.  Sitting in front of the spectacle of TV news infotainment and melodrama, my brain traverses the geopolitical – I try to puzzle out the agendas and grievances that led two young men to cram nails and ball bearings into a pair of pressure cookers and then kill and maim families on a crisp Monday morning.  I think in terms of indoctrination and world-view.

But when I lay in bed at night, I think like a father – I think about the more treacherous questions of how, why, and what could have been done differently for the children that eventually became these men.  How much, if at all, can we lay some portion of the blame at the feet of the people brought these two murderers into the world?Child with a gun

I know very well that my own kids were born with distinct personalities that have nothing to do with how they’re being raised.  My son, Z, is a rule follower, a negotiator, and deeply concerned about winning the approval of the authority figures in his life. Pebbles, my four year old girl, spends most of life laughing and dancing, but try to make her follow the rules and you’ll have a wailing ball of drama on your hands. This is who they are.  My wife and I have tried to sand down the sharper edges of their personalities with love, reason, and patience.  But – and I think every parent gets this – they are who they are and all you can really do is try to add a solid moral structure and healthy dose of responsibility to what the cosmic personality generator has handed you.

I remember having something of a small panic attack when Z came home from school with a little blood on his sleeve from a bumped lip at recess. A game of ‘Harry Potter’ had gotten a little out of hand and Z, who had insisted on being the bad guy, had gotten tackled on the pavement.  But it wasn’t the blood that bothered me, it was the idea that Z wanted to be the bad guy.  Was this a sign of something sinister brewing in my 6 year old?  Did I need to worry that, despite all my admonitions about kindness and love, Z was attracted to the dark side?  When I asked him, Z told me that the bad guy is the one that gets chase and, after all, he really loves to run.  Crisis averted, for now anyway.

But surely Susan and Tom Klebold loved their son as fiercely as I love mine.  Susan was, by most accounts, an engaged and involved mother.  By nine years old, her son Dylan was in the gifted program at school and a regular chess partner for his father. By seventeen, Dylan was dead in the Columbine library after participating in the worst school massacre in American history.

Do his parents own part of that tragedy or are they victims of it?

Bud Welch lost his daughter when Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols blew up the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City.  One night not long after,  Bud saw McVeigh’s father, Bill, on TV and told a friend, “Timothy’s father’s pain has to be incredible. As best I can tell, he did everything right.”  Three years after the bombing Bud sat down with Bill McVeigh and Tim’s sister Jennifer.  After two hours of talking,  Bud Welch went to leave.  Jennifer McVeigh wrapped her arms around Bud and began to sob.  Bud, thinking of his own daughter, held her and said, “Honey, the three of us are in this together for the rest of our lives.”  They had all lost someone they loved and none of them could tell you precisely why it had happened.

Maybe some human beings are fundamentally broken at birth. If so, can they be course corrected by family? Straightened out by discipline?  Overwhelmed by love? Can we, as parents, see this kind of thing coming, can we know the difference between a kid who’s different and a kid who’s dangerous?  Do we have any chance of seeing the line between solitary and sociopathic before it’s too late? It’s hard to believe we’re helpless but it’s equally hard to pinpoint what the Klebolds or Dahmers or McVeighs might have done differently.

I suppose it’s possible that taking Dzhokhar Tsarnaev alive provides a chance of inching closer to some kind of epiphany – but I doubt it.  It’s far more likely that he’ll simply be added to a long list of disaffected and destructive young men.

Like everyone that loves Boston and has agonized over this attack, I want justice. And it looks like we will get some measure of that.   But what I truly want is to understand. And that, I fear, is never going to happen.


2 Comments


  1. J.D., What causes a person to commit the most heinous of evils? Where is that God given understanding of morality broken? Is it from a poor upbringing? Is it from a flawed faith system? Is it from a broken culture that has few limits?
    I don’t think there is any one answer, but ultimately the accountability rests on the individual who made the deliberate choice to pursue evil. Personally, I believe the only guaranteed solution is experiencing the perfect love and remarkable healing that comes through forgiveness that only Jesus provides. Other faith systems offer partial solutions, but I believe that the only true solution, to a broken world filled with evil, is the saving work of Jesus Christ, and the love expressed from changed lives through true faith in Him.

  2. Great piece, JD. Chuck, while I am happy your faith offers you peace and serenity, Christianity will not help someone whose brain computes information with an inherently flawed algorithm. Anders Behring Breivik, found guilty for murdering 77 people (mostly children), saw himself as a Christian crusader. I think the point JD is trying to make is that perhaps no amount of love or order or faith can fix someone that is “fundamentally broken at birth”.

    Not even Jesus can polish a turd.

Leave a Reply